UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Janis Darlene FLOYD, Defendant-Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a guilty plea was knowing and voluntary when a district court asked the identical question during a plea colloquy but failed to inform the defendant that he was waiving the right to appeal the denial of non-jurisdictional pretrial motions
• dismissing appeal of pre-plea denial of suppression motion for lack of jurisdiction
• \[a]n unconditional guilty plea constitutes a waiver of the right to appeal all nonjurisdictional antecedent rulings and cures all antecedent constitutional defects\ (citations omitted)
• “Unless [the appellant’s] plea conformed with [Rule 11(a)(2)’s] specific requirements, we have no jurisdic- tion to hear her appeal.”
• “Unless [appellant’s] plea conformed with [Rule 11(a)(2)’s] specific requirements, we have no jurisdiction to hear her appeal.”
• “The government . . . moved to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because Floyd’s plea was not a Rule 11(a)(2) conditional guilty plea.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).