UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James L. KEEN, Defendant-Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Guns that are acquired at different times or stored in separate places permit separate punishment to be imposed for each violation of § 922(g).”
• firearm and ammunition charges are multiplicitous when there is no evidence that the two were possessed or stored separately
• “Regrettably, given the overwhelming evidence of Keen’s guilt and the inconvenience a retrial would impose . . . this discussion appears insufficient. . . . [He] is entitled to a rever- sal and an opportunity to make an informed and knowing choice.”
• “Regrettably, given the overwhelming evidence of Keen’s guilt and the inconvenience a retrial would impose . . . this discussion appears insufficient. . . . [He] is entitled to a rever- sal and an opportunity to make an informed and knowing choice.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).