Skip to main content
· 9/1/1998

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gulmohamed Abdulkader SERANG, Defendant-Appellant

Citations

  • 156 F.3d 910
  • 98 Daily Journal DAR 9497
  • 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6861
  • 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 21356
  • 1998 WL 550007

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a restaurant, as a commercial enterprise, per se substantially affects interstate commerce
  • holding in relation to § 844(i) that the appellant’s argument “that the … jury instructions were insufficient because they did not contain the word ‘substantial’ are without merit”
  • allowing, in a mail fraud case, evidence of a co-conspirator’s prior unsuccessful attempts to set fire to a restaurant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hawkins, Thomas, Silverman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.