Skip to main content
· 10/9/1996

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gerald Wayne HANNAH, Defendant-Appellant

Citations

  • 97 F.3d 1267
  • 96 Daily Journal DAR 12351
  • 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7524
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 26377
  • 1996 WL 577827

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • defendant was not prejudiced by supplemental instruction on aiding and abetting in response to a question from the jury when the court properly permitted supplemental closing arguments on that theory
  • defendant was not prejudiced by supplemental instruction on aiding and abetting in response to a question from the jury when the court properly permitted supplemental closing arguments on that theory

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pregerson, Boochever, Nelson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.