Skip to main content
· 12/5/1986

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. George W. BLOOD, Defendant-Appellant

Citations

  • 806 F.2d 1218
  • 22 Fed. R. Serv. 156
  • 7 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2613
  • 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 34306

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that \a clear and unambiguous admission of fact made by a party’s attorney in an opening statement in a civil or criminal case is binding upon the party\
  • “Generally, statements by an attorney concerning a matter within his employment may be admissible 9 against the retaining client.”
  • “Further, a clear and unambiguous admission of fact made by a party’s attorney in an opening statement in a civil or criminal case is binding upon the party.”
  • requiring party seeking safe-harbor protection to satisfy all four criteria

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Russell, Wilkins, Butzner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.