UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gabriel Valdez ANDAVERDE, Defendant-Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that custodial statements made to probation officers are subject to the same Miranda analysis as statements made to law enforcement officers
• holding statements by the defendant to his parole officer the day after the defendant received Miranda warnings were 21 Appellate Case: 23-5077 Document: 89-1 Date Filed: 10/11/2024 Page: 22 admissible
• stating that in considering whether an individual’s civil rights have been restored, the “Ninth Circuit considers whether the felon has been restored the right to vote, to sit on a jury and hold public office”
• implying waiver where a defendant did not invoke his rights, then initiated a conversation, and later did invoke his rights
• implying waiver where a defendant did not invoke his rights, then initiated a conversation, and later did invoke his rights
• 1-day interval between waiver of Miranda rights and defendant’s statement to law enforcement was not unreasonable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).