Skip to main content
· 9/18/1995

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Eugene CAMPER, Defendant-Appellant

Citations

  • 66 F.3d 229
  • 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7327
  • 95 Daily Journal DAR 12515
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 26137
  • 1995 WL 549075

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • emphasizing that remand for resentencing before different judge “in no way implies criticism of sentencing judge,” but rather is ordered “to insure compliance with the plea agreement”
  • “resentencing before a different judge in no way implies criticism of the sentencing judge” but “is done simply to insure compliance with the plea agreement”
  • finding defendant “need only exercise authority over one and not all of the other participants in order to merit the adjustment”
  • vacating sentence on direct review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hall, Leavy, Hogan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.