· 9/18/1995
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Eugene CAMPER, Defendant-Appellant
Citations
- 66 F.3d 229
- 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7327
- 95 Daily Journal DAR 12515
- 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 26137
- 1995 WL 549075
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- emphasizing that remand for resentencing before different judge “in no way implies criticism of sentencing judge,” but rather is ordered “to insure compliance with the plea agreement”
- “resentencing before a different judge in no way implies criticism of the sentencing judge” but “is done simply to insure compliance with the plea agreement”
- finding defendant “need only exercise authority over one and not all of the other participants in order to merit the adjustment”
- vacating sentence on direct review
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hall, Leavy, Hogan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.