· 5/5/1997
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Eliodero DeLaCORTE, Defendant-Appellant
Citations
- 113 F.3d 154
- 97 Daily Journal DAR 5713
- 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3296
- 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 9790
- 1997 WL 219505
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- a victim who is forced to stay in a car and is subjected to the assailant's continuing threats and possible violence will often be placed in greater danger than a victim who is released immediately
- ‘We conclude that 18 U.S.C. § 2119 ... incorporates the understanding of that term as developed under the common law and in other federal robbery statutes.”
- “We conclude that 18 U.S.C. § 2119, rather than creating a brand new definition of ‘taking’ for purposes of carjacking, incorporates the understanding of that term as developed under the common law and in other federal robbery statutes.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Beezer, Thompson, Gillmor
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.