UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edward William THOMPSON, Defendant-Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that 21 evidence that was “not probative of any element of the [plaintiff’s] case” is irrelevant
• “The government’s expert testified that upon holding the cylinder up to the light, ‘anybody could notice’ that someone had drilled holes in it.”
• “[W]e do not see how an error can be plain error when the Supreme Court and this court have not spoken on the subject, and the authority in other circuits is split.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).