UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donald William KIMBLE, Defendant-Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding an argument “to have been abandoned” when the 24 1 party failed to “coherently develop[ ]” it in their briefs
• deeming a party’s argument “abandoned” because it was not “coherently developed”
• argument not coherently developed in briefs deemed abandoned

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).