UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donald HOUSER, Defendant-Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• review is for plain error when no alternative instruction was proposed and no objection was made to the failure of the district court to give an alternative instruction
• “Malice aforethought does not require an element of willfulness if the existence of that 1 See also Gonzales-Ramirez v. Sessions, 727 F. App’x 404, 405 n.7 (9th Cir. 2018) (unpublished) (concluding that Voisine “does not affect our § 16(a) case law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).