Skip to main content
· 4/18/1997

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David HOLMES, Defendant-Appellant

Citations

  • 111 F.3d 463
  • 46 Fed. R. Serv. 1455
  • 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 7644
  • 1997 WL 186096

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that claimant who lies to obtain unemployment benefits from state agency that receives federal money for administrative costs cannot be prosecuted under 18 U.S.C. § 1001 unless benefits themselves are traceable to federal funds

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Contie, Boggs, Norris

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.