UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Darryl E. JACKSON, Defendant-Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting argument. that 100-to-1 ratio violates Equal Protection Clause and holding that rational basis for distinction still exists
• “Rule 404(b) is a rule of inclusion. Unless the evidence of other crimes tends only to prove propensity, it is admissible.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).