UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Coley QUINN, Defendant-Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that admission of cumulative testimony did not prejudice substantial rights even if there was a discovery violation
• affirming denial of request to order production of personnel records but noting that district court properly required the government to examine those records for Brady or Giglio material
• reviewing the denial of a criminal defendant’s discovery motion for abuse of discretion
• “Rule 103(a)(2) does not require that a formal offer of proof be made to preserve an objection.”
• “Where the substance of the evidence is apparent to the court from its context, an appellant is entitled to ordinary appellate review of a ruling excluding evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).