UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Chong Hyon McGREW, AKA Chong Hyon Park, Defendant-Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that offi- cers violated the Fourth Amendment when they did not serve the suspect with a copy of a sufficient warrant during the search of her home or at any time thereafter
• noting that “dialogue” between the individual and the officers “is impossible if citizens must rely on officers’ verbal representations of the scope of their authority”
• “[T]he government does not assert that the introduction of the seized evidence was harmless error, and we thus do not consider that question here. Accordingly, we reverse McGrew’s conviction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).