UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carlos Antonio DUQUE, Defendant-Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• valid waiver properly inferred because, after defendant received Miranda rights and was asked if he was \of a mind\ to speak with officers, he made incriminating statements
• valid waiver properly inferred because, after defendant received Miranda rights and was asked if he was “of a mind” to speak with officers, he made incriminating statements
• valid waiver properly inferred because, after defendant received Miranda rights and was asked if he was \of a mind\ to speak with officers, he made incriminating statements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).