UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bruce R. WEST, Sr., Defendant-Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• requiring comparison of the number of allegedly deficient transactions with the total number of nondeficient transactions
• upholding exclusion of expert testimony where jury was “perfectly capable of determining, based on the evidence presented,” the contested issue
• “At all times, the burden is on the claimant to establish [his] 23 entitlement to disability insurance benefits.”
• “The other crime is admitted to show this larger goal rather than to show defendant’s propensity to commit crimes.”
• “[A]n unexplained, or inadequately explained failure . . . to follow 23 a prescribed course of treatment . . . can cast doubt on the sincerity of the claimant’s pain testimony.”
• “It is well-settled law in this circuit that unpublished cases are not binding precedent.” (citing Salamalekis v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., 221 F.3d 828, 833 (6th Cir. 2000); Cattin v. Gen. Motors Corp., 955 F.2d 416, 431 n. 14 (6th Cir. 1992))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).