United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. James Albert McClelland Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting outrageous government conduct claim but noting that the government agent “did encourage McClelland at various times”
• rejecting outrageous government conduct claim but noting that the government agent “did encourage McClelland at various times”
• rejecting outrageous government conduct claim but noting that the government agent “did encourage McClelland at various times”
• Dismissals for outrageous conduct must meet “extremely high standard” and be “grossly shocking and . . . outrageous,” such as where the government “completely fabricat[ed] the crime.”
• defense of entrapment requires showing that government induced otherwise innocent person to commit crime

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).