United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Eric Kung-Shou Ho, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that we may affirm on any basis supported by the record
• reversing district court refusal to impose Subsection (b)(1) adjustment where preponderance of evidence showed that asbestos escaped into environment
• emphasizing that Congress may only regulate “commercial activity”
• rejecting interstate commerce challenge to federal asbestos abatement violations at a fixed, intrastate location based on the fact that the defendant “gained a commercial advantage on licensed abatement companies” and deprived them of “a promising business opportunity”
• “Congress may not add the words ‘interstate com- merce’ to every statute and expect the courts meekly to com- ply.”
• dis- cussing work practice standards involving asbestos

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).