Skip to main content
· 5/18/1994

United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Edward Harry Weekley, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee

Citations

  • 24 F.3d 1125
  • 94 Daily Journal DAR 6671
  • 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3561
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 10882

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the defendant could not be sentenced as a career offender because Washington's attempt statute, under which the defendant had been convicted, proscribed more conduct than was defined in 18 U.S.C. S 924(e)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wright, Weight, Schroeder, Brunetti

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.