UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sheri Lynn BULACAN, Defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that regulations authorizing federal officers to search an individual’s belongings for narcotics upon entry to a federal building violated the Fourth Amendment
• “The Government’s interests in preventing the entry of contraband at the border is substantial, and the protections of the Fourth Amendment are weakened.”
• “The Government’s interests in preventing the entry of con- traband at the border is substantial, and the protections of the Fourth Amendment are weakened.”
• “To meet the test of reasonableness, an administrative screening search must be as limited in its intrusiveness as is consistent with satisfaction of the administrative need that justifies it”
• “Limited administrative searches may be conducted at the border. . . .”
• \Limited administrative searches may be conducted at the border....\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).