· 5/2/1979
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES Et Al., Defendants-Appellees
Citations
- 595 F.2d 1386
- 19 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1455
- 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 15006
- 19 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 9257
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “It would defeat the purpose of the automatic fund suspension provision ... to enjoin the suspension of such'funds to maintain the status quo that the statute was designed to disrupt.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hufstedler, Tang, Solomon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.