United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Pierre Fouche, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding no obligation to clarify the ambiguous invocation of the right to counsel, “Maybe I should talk to a lawyer”
• inferences or deductions apparent to trained law enforcement officers may be considered under the totality of circumstances
• defendant said he “ ‘might want to talk to a lawyer’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).