United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. John Boshell, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that evidence is only material “if there is a reasonable probability that, had the evidence been disclosed to the defense, the result of the proceeding would have been different”
• finding that the defendants failed to make a showing that notes were read or adopted by the witness and that the notes were therefore not subject to the Jencks Act production requirements
• approving a district court's downward departure where certain co-defendants were sentenced before, and others were sentenced after, the Guidelines took effect
• interpreting the Guidelines narrowly to avoid conflict with Section 3661
• \Appellant must show prejudice to be entitled to reversal.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).