United States of America, Plaintif-Appellant v. Albert Ganier, III

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that interpretations of a forensic software used to understand what searches had been run at particular dates and times was more akin to “specialized knowledge” than outputs of popular software programs
• district court abuses its discretion when making evidentiary rulings if it “make[s] errors of law or clear errors of factual determination”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).