Skip to main content
· 1/22/1996

United States of America, in No. 95-1109 v. Robert Boggi, in No. 95-1031

Citations

  • 74 F.3d 470
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 710

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • considering, in a cross-appeal, arguments raised in a reply brief because the opposing party had a chance to respond

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stapleton, McKee, Norris

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.