Skip to main content
· 10/2/1990

United States of America, in No. 89-5510 v. Gaetano Vastola, in No. 89-5372 v. Elias Saka, in No. 89-5383

Citations

  • 915 F.2d 865
  • 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 17277

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that tapes should be sealed either \as soon as was practical\ after the actual surveillance ended \or as soon as practical\ after the final extension order expires
  • holding that tapes should be sealed either “as soon as was practical” after the actual surveillance ended “or as soon as practical” after the final extension order expires
  • stating that ruling on a motion to reopen a suppression hearing after remand \is similar to ... ruling on a motion by the [G]overnment to reopen\
  • remanding determination on adequacy of government’s explanation for delay in sealing wiretap tapes because government may have relied on a case that was later overruled by the Supreme Court
  • remanding determination on adequacy of government’s explanation for delay in sealing wiretap tapes because government may have relied on a case that was later overruled by the Supreme Court
  • using “as soon as practical” standard for immediacy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Greenberg, Scirica, Seitz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.