Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• distinguishing control over employment exercised in a regulatory capacity from that applied “in the course of a customary employer-employee relationship” and concluding that the former did not provide a basis for Title VII liability
• “[I]f an employer cannot accommodate a religious practice without undue hardship, the practice is not ‘religion’ within the meaning of Title VII.”
• “[I]f an employer cannot accommodate a religious practice without undue hardship, the practice is not ‘religion’ within the meaning of Title VII.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).