Skip to main content
· 2/11/1977

United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Hi-Way Electric Co. v. The Home Indemnity Company, and Pathman Construction Co., Defendants

Citations

  • 549 F.2d 10
  • 23 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 388
  • 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 10071

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a district court wherein a judgment is registered has more than merely ministerial powers in the enforcement proceedings, although noting that these powers have not been precisely defined
  • stating that a district court wherein a judgment is registered has more than merely ministerial powers in the enforcement proceedings, although noting that these powers have not been precisely defined
  • reversing the court of registration’s “mechanical” enforcement of the registered judgment and remanding for an exercise of that court’s discretion as to whether a Rule 62(f) stay of execution of judgment was appropriate
  • a motion under Fed.R.Civ.P. 62(f) for stay of execution of a registered judgment is addressed to the sound discretion of the registering court
  • a proposed class with 110 members “clearly [included] a 13 sufficient number to meet the numerosity requirements”
  • order denying stay of enforcement of judgment is appealable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Swygert, Pell, Campbell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.