Skip to main content
· 12/19/1990

United States of America, for the Use and Benefit of Blue Circle West, Inc. v. Tucson Mechanical Contracting Inc., an Arizona Corporation, Dba Tmci

Citations

  • 921 F.2d 911
  • 90 Daily Journal DAR 14322
  • 36 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,997
  • 90 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9171
  • 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 21907
  • 1990 WL 205282

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the intent of the Miller Act notice requirement is, in part, to help general contractors to “avoid such double liability”
  • holding claimant’s letters were not specific enough to provide notice as they failed to give any indication claimant was looking to the prime contractor for payment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beezer, Kozinski, Kleinfeld

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.