United States of America Ex Rel. Robert B. J. Mulvaney v. John Rush, Warden of the Essex County Penitentiary

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Rule 10(e) is apparently intended to ‘supplement’ a record, not to supply in substance a large new record never before the District Court and never considered by it.”
• ‘We are not a fact-finding body. We are entitled to have the judgment of the district court ... as to findings of fact....”
• “[t]he purpose of the rule is to permit correction or modification of the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals so that it adequately reflects what happened in the District Court”
• “The purpose of the rule is to permit correction or modification of the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals so that it adequately reflects what happened in the District Court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).