United States of America Ex Rel. Richard Feingold v. Adminastar Federal, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a fraud is publicly disclosed \when the critical elements exposing the transaction as fraudulent are placed in the public domain\
• “Administrative reports are publicly disclosed because, by their very nature, they establish the relevant agency’s awareness of the information in those reports.”
• “Administrative reports are publicly disclosed because, by their very nature, they establish the relevant agency’s awareness of the informa- tion in those reports.”
• “Administrative reports are publicly disclosed because, by their very nature, they establish the relevant agency’s awareness of the information in those reports.”
• “Where a public disclosure has occurred, [the government] is already in a position to vindicate society's interests, and a qui tam action would serve no purpose.”
• “Because Feingold points to no evidence upon which this suit depends that is not publically disclosed, we hold that Feingold has based his action on publically disclosed documents____”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).