Skip to main content
· 9/8/1994

United States of America Ex Rel. Morongo Band of Mission Indians v. Frank Rose

Citations

  • 34 F.3d 901
  • 30 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 813
  • 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6921
  • 94 Daily Journal DAR 12676
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 24250
  • 1994 WL 482563

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that former defendant was not a necessary party who had to be joined in suit after he settled with plaintiff, demonstrating that he “did not feel that it was necessarily in his interest to remain a party in this action”
  • \Montana ... only established that alienation of lands in fee to non-Indians presumptively divests [Indians] of authority.\
  • “Montana ... only established that alienation of lands in fee to non-Indians presumptively divests [Indians] of authority.”
  • \Montana ... only established that alienation of lands in fee to non-Indians presumptively divests [Indians] of authority.\
  • “Montana ... only established that alienation of lands in fee to non-Indians presumptively divests [Indians] of authority.”
  • Montana exceptions are \relevant only after the court concludes that there has been a general divestiture of tribal authority over non-Indians by alienation of the land\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wiggins, Nelson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.