· 4/19/1996
United States of America Ex Rel. Modern Electric, Inc., Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Ideal Electronic Security Co., Inc., Appellee/cross-Appellant
Citations
- 81 F.3d 240
- 317 U.S. App. D.C. 145
- 34 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 118
- 40 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,918
- 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 8474
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- requiring “circumstances which reasonably notified the person that the plaintiff, in performing such services, expected to be paid”
- explaining differences between quantum meruit and unjust enrichment causes of action
- evidence related to unpleaded claim of quasi-contractual unjust enrichment was also relevant to pleaded claim of quantum meruit based on contract implied in fact
- complaint amended to include unjust enrichment claim, after parties had tried similar quantum meruit claim
- after trial for breach of contract and quantum meruit, plaintiff was permitted to amend complaint to include an unjust enrichment claim, which conformed to the evidence presented at trial
- the same evidence often supports a contract claim and an unjust enrichment claim
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wald, Williams, Tatel
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.