Skip to main content
· 4/19/1996

United States of America Ex Rel. Modern Electric, Inc., Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Ideal Electronic Security Co., Inc., Appellee/cross-Appellant

Citations

  • 81 F.3d 240
  • 317 U.S. App. D.C. 145
  • 34 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 118
  • 40 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,918
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 8474

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • requiring “circumstances which reasonably notified the person that the plaintiff, in performing such services, expected to be paid”
  • explaining differences between quantum meruit and unjust enrichment causes of action
  • evidence related to unpleaded claim of quasi-contractual unjust enrichment was also relevant to pleaded claim of quantum meruit based on contract implied in fact
  • complaint amended to include unjust enrichment claim, after parties had tried similar quantum meruit claim
  • after trial for breach of contract and quantum meruit, plaintiff was permitted to amend complaint to include an unjust enrichment claim, which conformed to the evidence presented at trial
  • the same evidence often supports a contract claim and an unjust enrichment claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wald, Williams, Tatel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.