United States of America Ex Rel. Melvin Lee Smith v. Charles J. Rowe and William Klusak

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defense counsel’s failure to object at time of allegedly improper testimony is factor to be weighed
• district court’s opinion reprinted in appendix to this court’s opinion
• district court's opinion reprinted in appendix to this court's opinion
• prosecutor’s comments during closing arguments, as noted in the opinion at 1207: “We see no legal distinction between the comments by the prosecutor to the jury and any attempt he might have undertaken to impeach petitioner * * * on cross-examination.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).