Skip to main content
· 1/22/2002

United States of America Ex Rel. Janet Chandler, ph.d., Cross-Appellee v. Cook County, Illinois, 1

Citations

  • 277 F.3d 969
  • 18 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 512
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 847
  • 2002 WL 75859

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Illinois home-rule units are presumed to be “persons” for purposes of federal statutes but states are not because they are sovereign
  • explaining that reasoning behind the immunity from punitive damages was to protect taxpayers from bearing the responsibility for the punitive damages
  • finding that Stevens's presumptions \cut[] the other way for municipalities\ and holding that counties are amenable to suit under the qui tam provision
  • exploring legislative history and purpose of Act and finding Congress intended municipalities to be subject to the False Claims Act
  • \The Justice Department may have myriad reasons for permitting the private suit to go forward including limited prosecutorial resources and confidence in the relator's attorney.\
  • “The Justice Department may have myriad reasons for permitting the private suit to go forward including limited prosecutorial resources and confidence in the relator’s attorney.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flaum, Posner, Ripple

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.