Skip to main content
· 2/5/1991

United States of America, Ex Rel. Bessie I. Fleming v. Jane Huch, Warden, Dwight Correctional Center

Citations

  • 924 F.2d 679
  • 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 1566
  • 1991 WL 11039

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that Falconer and Rose found that the error was \inherently prejudicial\
  • recognizing that Falconer and Rose found that the error was \inherently prejudicial\
  • recognizing that Falconer and Rose found that the error was “inherently prejudicial”
  • “At oral argument, the State basically (and wisely) conceded that, after Falconer and Rose, it cannot be disputed that the errors in these jury instructions constitute a violation of due process”
  • ‘At oral argument, the State basically (and wisely) conceded that, after Falconer and Rose, it cannot be disputed that the errors in these jury instructions constitute a violation of due process’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Wood, Eschbach

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.