United States of America Ex Rel. Agnes Scranton v. The State of New York

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that pretrial detainee challenging denial of speedy trial rights was not entitled to habeas corpus relief because she had not exhausted available state remedies
• holding that “[w]hile [section 2241] does not by its own terms require the exhaustion of state remedies as a prerequisite to the grant of federal habeas relief, decisional law has superimposed such a requirement in order to accommodate principles of federalism
• holding that “[w]hile [section 2241] does not by its own terms require the exhaustion of state remedies as a prerequisite to the grant of federal habeas relief, decisional law has superimposed such a requirement in order to accommodate principles of federalism
• holding that “[w]hile [§ 2241] does not by its own terms require the exhaustion of state remedies as a prerequisite to the grant of federal habeas relief, decisional law has superimposed such a requirement in order to accommodate principles of federalism.”
• explaining that while exhaustion is not a statutory prerequisite, “decisional law has superimposed such a requirement in order to accommodate principles of federalism.”
• treating pretrial application to bar state court retrial following a mistrial on speedy trial grounds as a § 2241 petition

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).