United States of America, Ex Rel. A+ Homecare, Inc. v. Medshares Management Group, Inc. Trevecca Home Health Services, Inc., Stephen H. Winters

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• establishing a broad test for whether a claim is “material” under the FCA
• “[A] court can . . . consider a motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict only if the moving party has previously made a motion for a directed verdict at the close of all the evidence.” (emphasis in original) (internal quotation marks omitted)
• listing exceptions to the rule

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).