United States of America, Cross-Appellant v. Marsden W. Miller, Jr., and William C. Huls, Cross-Appellees

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a prior Fifth Circuit decision was “no longer good law” in light of Richardson, and construing this latter ruling as “refus[ing] to extend Burks beyond instances in which the appellate court in fact reversed for insufficient evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).