United States of America, Cross-Appellant v. Charles G. Floyd, Jr., Cross-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that § 1292(a)(1) provides jurisdiction to review decisions regarding pretrial asset restraining orders issued under 21 U.S.C. § 853(e), the criminal analogue to 18 U.S.C. § 983(j)
• reviewing pretrial restraining order issued under 21 U.S.C. § 853 (e)(1)(A), stating that \pretrial asset restraining orders are appealable as 'injunctions' under § 1292(a)(1)\
• \[T]his command for a liberal construction does not authorize us to amend by interpretation.\
• “[The] command for a liberal construction does not authorize [a court] to amend by interpretation.”
• “[T]his command for a liberal construction does not authorize us to amend by interpretation.”
• “[T]his command for liberal construction does not authorize us to amend by interpretation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).