Skip to main content
· 10/9/1992

United States of America, Cross-Appellant v. Central Gulf Lines, Inc., Etc., Cross-Appellee

Citations

  • 974 F.2d 621
  • 1993 A.M.C. 2622
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 25470
  • 1992 WL 234607

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that for evidence to be admissible under public records hearsay exception, person making report must have observed matters first hand and acted pursuant to a legal duty
  • “CGL could instruct the port tug authorities as to the discharge of cargo, and the port tugs would often follow CGL’s instructions. In addition, CGL independently made the decision to use LASH barges and buoys attached to rope, wire, and concrete blocks.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Van Graafeiland, King, Garza

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.