United States of America, Cross-Appellant v. Alfred Covino, Cross-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “fear need not be consequence of direct ... threat ... but need ... be reasonable under [the] circumstances”
• defendant’s statement, that he wanted “share” of future profits, “followed by inquiry whether [contractor] wanted to do his ‘share’ in the context of [defendant’s] increasing demands for services and.cash,” could be considered threat of future harm under Hobbs Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).