United States of America, Charles M. Carberry v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Ron Carey & William Hamilton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• describing “narrow scopé” of review where independent officer appointed pursuant to consent order is “given wide discretion”
• considering a claim that a postjudgment plea of guilty was newly discovered evidence
• describing standard for considering newly discovered evidence under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(2)
• considering a claim that a postjudgment plea of guilty was newly discovered evidence
• “Controlling cases have held that if the reasons offered for relief from judgment can be considered in one of the more specific clauses of Rule 60(b), such reasons will not justify relief under Rule 60(b)(6)”
• requiring also a demonstration that new evidence existed at time of prior order, that the moving party was ignorant of it despite due diligence, and that it is not cumulative of other evidence or merely impeaching

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).