United States of America, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Larry Risse, Appellant/cross-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• deciding that telephone call to residence confirming that suspect was there was far beyond what is necessary to establish reasonable belief
• finding that a reasonable belief, even if incorrect in fact, is all that is necessary to enter a suspect’s dwelling
• finding that a reasonable belief, even if incorrect in fact, is all that is necessary to enter a suspect's dwelling
• stating that the phrases \staying with\ and \living with\ are sufficient to support police officers' belief that the suspect resided at the location at issue
• noting that “use of the colloquial term ‘staying with’ ” can be interpreted to mean “living with”
• noting that \use of the colloquial term 'staying with'\ can be interpreted to mean \living with\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).