United States of America, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Kevin Lee Davis, Appellant/cross-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that unspecified prior intelligence that defendant possessed firearms was one of several articulable facts creating reasonable suspicion
• noting in the Rule 32 context that the district court’s remarks at sentencing should be read in context
• upholding protective sweep of defendant’s barn after arrest outside of the barn
• finding a conspiracy to manufacture methamphetamine based upon the defendant’s “voluntary acts”
• approving protective sweep of barn following arrest of person in farmhouse
• upholding protective sweep because the existence of surveillance cameras and the presence of multiple cars on the property, as well as the knowledge of defendant’s prior firearms possession, are factors that can indicate a “heightened possibility of a surprise attack”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).