Skip to main content
· 6/17/1994

United States of America, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Cordell Spencer, Appellant/cross-Appellee

Citations

  • 25 F.3d 1105
  • 306 U.S. App. D.C. 399
  • 40 Fed. R. Serv. 1292
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 14877
  • 1994 WL 263668

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Finally, it merits re-emphasis that the underlying purpose of the Federal Magistrates Act is to improve the effective administration of justice.”
  • “De novo review of the magistrate judges’ findings and 26 recommendations is required if, but only if, one or both parties file objections to the 27 findings and recommendations.” (emphasis in original)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mikva, Buckley, Randolph

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.