UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Michele SINDONA, Defendant-Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that prospective witnesses specifically refused to come to the United States
• allowing depositions of four witnesses, all of whom were beyond court’s subpoena power, and two of whom specifically refused to come to the United States
• finding witnesses unavailable where they were Italian citizens, never located in the United States and therefore outside the subpoena power of the court
• upholding conviction of bank outsider for conspiracy to violate § 1005
• crime not complete until funds were transferred from account that jury was entitled to find 45 USCA11 Case: 18-10980 Date Filed: 12/23/2020 Page: 46 of 61 was effectively controlled by another despite defendant’s access to the funds
• “None of the four witnesses were subject to subpoena.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).