UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Byron E. PRUGH, Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Defendant found in criminal contempt for engaging in activities prohibited by consent decree; government was not required to show he knew he was violating the terms of the injunction; proof he intentionally conducted the proscribed stock transaction was enough
• Defendant found in criminal contempt for engaging in activities prohibited by consent decree; government was not required to show he knew he was violating the terms of the injunction; proof he intentionally conducted the proscribed stock transaction was enough

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).