Skip to main content
· 7/21/2004

United States of America, Appellee-Plaintiff v. Miscellaneous Firearms, Explosives, Destructive Devices and Ammunition, Appeal Of: Donna Fleischli

Citations

  • 376 F.3d 709
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 15022
  • 2004 WL 1624515

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the ATF commenced a nonjudicial forfeiture by sending a letter to the defendant notifying him of his rights forty-four days after the property was seized
  • stating that the ATF commenced a nonjudicial forfeiture by sending a letter to the defendant notifying him of his rights forty-four days after the property was seized
  • noting that statu- tory provisions should not be construed in a way that renders other provisions of the same statute inconsistent, meaningless, or superfluous
  • “We will not construe a statute in a way that makes words or phrases meaningless, redundant, or superfluous.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flaum, Bauer, Evans

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.